Genesis Sets Back Feminism Thousands of Years
The article relates the treatment of women during witchhunts to the way that Eve is portrayed in the creation story. Since Eve was created from Adam, she is thought to be a helper and a way to continue the human line. Furthermore, since Eve was created after Adam, there's a chronological importance, even though the animals were created before Adam. Once Eve talks to the serpent, many readers interpret this to mean that Eve had a weaker mind and gave in to temptation, but what if the snake talked to her instead of Adam because she had a freer mind and individuality? Then Eve gives the apple to Adam, and Adam begs God for their forgiveness. As seen in the picture above, Eve looks guilty as Adam pleads to God.
I went to a Catholic elementary school and grew up reading passages from the Bible, and I wonder how this interpretation of Eve affected my mentality toward myself and other women. And how that interpretation would be different had the Bible not existed, or had been written from Eve's perspective. Another thing the article mentioned, was that a woman named Elizabeth Cady Staton tried reinterpreting the Bible from a feminist perspective. Shockingly, this did not gain much traction. It makes me sad that a story some people believe in can have such a profound impact on women thousands of years later. I wonder how society would be different had we not been surrounded by the creation story of Adam and Eve.
The ways that Eve was portrayed in the Bible mimics why men thought women would be more dangerous as witches. During the witchhunts, and still today, women are viewed as more seductive and weaker-minded, which ultimately puts them in danger. Furthermore, as many men who led these witchhunts were Puritans and believed everything the Bible said, how could they not have blamed women and thought poorly of them. Complete belief and faith in an idea are much more dangerous than we give it credit for.
Thanks for this great blog post. You touch on issues of profound importance--issues that arose centuries ago and still infect us. You are right to be mad and question the validity and value of these traditional beliefs. All of the early Christian patriarchs--as the name implies--were men, and they did not want to share power with women. If you are ever curious, there's been wonderful work done on this subject. I am not pushing you to read a scholarly book, but one of the best books recently done in this area is: Adam, Eve, and the Serpent: Sex and Politics in Early Christianity, by Elaine Pagels.
ReplyDelete